Connecting Regions of Asia.

Bangladesh : Legacy Of Growth , And Blood


Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia are repositories of two distinct legacies.

Hasina carries forward her father Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s legacy of national liberation and the dream of ‘Sonar Bangla’ (Golden Bengal). This is the legacy of the fight for independence from Pakistan amidst the worst genocide in South Asia.

Khaleda has lived up to the legacy of her late husband, General Ziaur Rahman, Bangladesh’s first military ruler who turned the clock back on the country’s “unfinished revolution”  by setting in motion a process of re-Pakistanisation which culminated in his successor General HM Ershad declaring Islam as the state religion of Bangladesh.

Bangabandhu’s 1972 Constitution established secularism as a cardinal value for Bangladesh’s nascent polity. Zia and Ershad overturned it and introduced the primacy of Islam even as they legitimised the defeated forces of 1971. The military rulers set up their own parties but needed the Islamist radical groups like the pro-Pakistan Jamaat-e-Islami as allies to marginalise the popular heft of the Awami League.

Hasina has now presided over Bangladesh’s “Golden Decade of Development” after Zia’s half-decade rule in the early part of the century. Hasina has notched an amazing economic turnaround that makes Bangladesh an emerging Asian Tiger from a ‘Basket Case’ (as described by Henry Kissinger) after Zia had reduced the country to the ‘second front of Islamist terror’ in South Asia by presiding a sharp surge in violent religious radicalism that associates with Pakistan.

Hasina has now been described by the BBC as the “voice of the vulnerable” in the global effort to arrest climate change. Her economic model of inclusive growth is more focused on human development and distributive justice and less on pure growth statistics and wealth creation. Zia upholds the legacy of unbridled corruption under whose shadow son Tarique Rahman created a culture of kleptocracy with a leaked US embassy cable holding him  “guilty of egregious political corruption that has had a serious adverse effect on US national interests”, namely the stability of democratic institutions and US foreign assistance goals.

Under Hasina, Bangladesh’s GDP growth surged past 6 percent per annum and an estimated 50 million Bangladeshis have been elevated to the middle-income group. There was a slump in the poverty level from 38 percent in 2006 to 24 percent in 2013.

Bangladesh’s per capita income has soared to $1,602 past giant neighbour India with the poverty rate slumping further to 22.4 percent. The forex reserves rose to $45 billion and GDP stands at $324 billion. And from power generation to road building to the completion of the 6 kms rail and road bridge on the Padma, Bangladesh has gained from Hasina’s single-minded zeal to develop critical infrastructure that spurs industrialisation and an export-driven manufacturing economy.

The signature statistics of the Khaleda Zia era was the simultaneous bomb explosions in all the districts of Bangladesh. Those of the Hasina era swing around economic growth. Just look at the big headlines during the Khaleda Zia era: “Cocoon of Terror”, “Deadly Cargo”, “The Next Islamist Revolution”, but those of the Hasina era: “Bangladesh: The next Asian Bull case”, “Life Begins at Fifty for Bangladesh”, “Unstoppable Bangladesh” and so much more.

The difference between what the two legacies have to offer is obvious and the choice made by Bangladeshis for the last whole decade points to what most in the country want.

The Pakistan model of a close unholy nexus between the state, the deep state, the radical religious groups, a section of big business and foreign powers seeking to use the country for their own strategic gains has failed badly. Pakistan’s descend into a failed state since the 1971 war has been steady, notwithstanding the country becoming a nuclear power. The brief experiment with that model during the Khaleda regime early in this century brought disaster for Bangladesh with Islamist terrorism, which had gained its initial ground during Khaleda’s first tenure in the 1990s.

Hasina proceeded to prioritise economic and human development after her return to power in January 2009, she had to also launch an all-out campaign to stamp out these hydra-headed terror groups, which obnoxiously keep multiplying even as core factions fall apart under tough state response. She was dead right in realising that the fight to root out Islamist terror and stamp out the linkages between some Indian rebel groups and a part of Bangladesh’s security establishment ( again following the Pakistani model) was as important as the pursuit of development goals and preparing the country to withstand the adverse impact of climate change. The best of long term vision can be ruined if law and order suffers and terrorism driven by religious madness takes root.

Hasina’s task in pursuing her development goals was considerably impeded not only by the proliferation of terror groups from the previous Khaleda regime but also by their close linkages with parties in the BNP-led alliance. Her determination to go ahead with the 1971 war crimes trials, a pre-poll promise to her people, got some top Islamist opposition leaders in the crosshairs because of the substantial evidence that existed against them for their involvement in the 1971 atrocities. Many of Hasina’s detractors saw in the trials an attempt to decapitate the opposition and elements in the West started crying foul over the legality of the war crimes trial. Hasina persisted and did what her people wanted her to do – put an end to the culture of impunity that stemmed out of the Pakistani atrocities but that was then carried forward through the 1975 coup and the 2004 grenade attack on Hasina herself when she was in the opposition.

The Zia legacy grows out of the Pakistani military culture of total annihilation of opponents and is a continuation of that culture. So if the Pakistanis went about the systematic and total annihilation of the Bengali intelligentsia in the last days of the 1971 war to deprive the new nation of its brains, the 1975 massacre was aimed at eliminating the entire Bangabandhu family, including elements of the extended family.

The 2004 grenade attack on an Awami League rally, planned meticulously but executed shoddily, was an attempt to eliminate in one stroke the entire senior leadership of the Awami League which was gathered with Hasina on a makeshift podium. Hasina would have failed the nation if her government did not pursue the perpetrators of these horrific crimes. She did not, even when accused by the Western human rights brigade who oppose the due process of law unfolding in Bangladesh during the war crimes trial or these other massacre cases but are shy to acknowledge the 1971 massacre as a genocide, despite the copious accounts by some of their own diplomats like Archer Blood.  In short, the Zia legacy that rests its legitimacy on Ziaur Rahman reading out the declaration of independence on behalf of Bangabandhu over the radio at the beginning of the Liberation War is the “Legacy of Blood”, the apt title of a bestseller by celebrated journalist Anthony Mascarenhas, who details the 1975 coup and the patronage that General Zia and later his wife extended to the perpetrators of the coup by giving them diplomatic postings.

If the Zia legacy is one of “blood and more blood” (the BNP’s petrol-bombings that burnt countless innocents to death), the Hasina legacy is one of development and growth, one of upholding the glory of Bengali language and culture (like her father, she delivers her UN speeches in Bangla) that gives the nation its unique identity.  The choice is obvious. Would Bangladeshis, who are outwardly mobile and hugely dynamic both at elite and grassroots level, not want the success formula of a moderate Islam-centric secular polity to anchor the national economic and human development to continue with a professional military guarding national frontiers and the police and paramilitary ensuring internal law and order? And a foreign policy that balances all major powers and neighbours intelligently to foster the key goal of national prosperity!  As the countdown to the next parliamentary polls begins, Bangladeshis will have to make up their minds.

Courtesy – BDNews24

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More